As global cyber threats continue to rise in complexity and scale, no single nation can effectively protect its critical infrastructure in isolation. Cybersecurity alliances have become essential for countries to defend against sophisticated adversaries targeting power grids, financial systems, healthcare networks, and government institutions. Canada, with its deep economic and strategic ties to the United States, NATO, and private-sector cybersecurity firms, relies on these partnerships to bolster its defences.

However, with U.S.-Canada relations strained by trade disputes and shifting geopolitical priorities, Canada faces heightened cybersecurity risks. A weakening of cooperative frameworks could leave Canada’s infrastructure more vulnerable to cyberattacks from state-sponsored actors, cybercriminal organizations, and hacktivists. In this blog, we explore the critical role of international cybersecurity alliances, lessons from global initiatives, and why Canada must double down on supporting its domestic cybersecurity sector to ensure national resilience.

The Importance of Cybersecurity Alliances in Protecting Critical Infrastructure

1. U.S.-Canada Cybersecurity Cooperation

The United States has long been Canada’s most significant cybersecurity partner. Through initiatives like the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) (CISA.gov) and the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) (NERC.com), the two countries share threat intelligence, coordinate responses to cyber incidents, and establish best practices for securing North American infrastructure.

One of the most vital agreements underpinning this relationship is the Canada-U.S. Cybersecurity Action Plan, which facilitates:

• Real-time threat intelligence sharing to counter emerging cyber threats.
• Joint cybersecurity exercises, such as the annual Cyber Storm exercise that simulates large-scale cyberattacks.
• Collaboration on critical infrastructure protection, particularly in energy and telecommunications sectors.

However, growing trade tensions and political shifts in the U.S. could disrupt these cooperative efforts, leaving Canadian infrastructure at greater risk.

2. Canada’s Role in NATO’s Cyber Defense Strategy

Canada is a member of NATO’s Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence (CCDCOE), contributing expertise to NATO’s cyber defense exercises such as Locked Shields—the world’s largest live-fire cyber defense drill. Canada’s participation in NATO’s cyber strategy ensures:

• A collective response framework to counter cyber warfare.
• Intelligence-sharing mechanisms that strengthen Canada’s early warning capabilities.
• Standardization of cybersecurity practices across allied nations.

Despite these benefits, NATO’s cyber defense efforts are sometimes hampered by differing national policies and priorities among member states. Canada must work proactively to maintain its leadership in NATO’s cybersecurity framework, ensuring its interests remain protected.

3. The Role of the Private Sector in Cybersecurity Alliances

Public-private partnerships play an indispensable role in cybersecurity defense. Large tech firms, cybersecurity vendors, and financial institutions provide cutting-edge tools, research, and expertise that governments alone cannot develop at scale. Canada’s collaboration with industry leading cybersecurity firms, alongside domestic cybersecurity firms, strengthens national resilience.

Notable initiatives include:

• The Canadian Centre for Cyber Security (CCCS) which partners with private-sector firms to share threat intelligence and bolster cyber defenses.
• The National Cyber Threat Assessment (NCTA), which provides statistics on cyber risks affecting Canada’s critical infrastructure.
• Collaboration with the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC) to combat cyber-enabled financial crimes.

Lessons from Global Cyber Defense Initiatives

Canada can draw valuable lessons from international cybersecurity initiatives that have successfully strengthened national and regional defenses. Some key takeaways include:

1. The European Union’s NIS2 Directive

The European Union’s NIS2 Directive enhances cybersecurity across member states by mandating stricter security measures, incident reporting requirements, and cross-border cooperation. Key lessons for Canada:

• Stronger regulatory frameworks improve cyber resilience by setting mandatory security standards, ensuring organizations adhere to best practices, and providing enforcement mechanisms to mitigate cyber threats effectively.
• Harmonization of cybersecurity policies across regions fosters better threat response capabilities by enabling seamless collaboration between countries, reducing legal and regulatory conflicts, and streamlining information sharing to combat cross-border cyber threats.

2. The U.S. CISA and Zero Trust Adoption

The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has pushed for widespread adoption of Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) to secure government networks. This model assumes that threats exist both outside and inside a network, requiring continuous verification of users, devices, and applications before granting access.

By implementing Zero Trust, organizations can limit the spread of cyber threats, protect sensitive data, and minimize the risks posed by insider threats. Many governments and enterprises worldwide have already begun integrating this approach to strengthen security postures and improve cyber resilience.

Canada must accelerate its Zero Trust initiatives across federal and provincial institutions to reduce its attack surface, ensuring that security policies adapt to an evolving cyber threat landscape. This includes increased investment in identity verification, multi-factor authentication (MFA), network segmentation, and real-time anomaly detection to mitigate risks efficiently.

The Growing Risk of Cybersecurity Gaps Amid U.S.-Canada Trade Tensions

Recent developments have underscored the potential cybersecurity risks arising from escalating U.S.-Canada trade tensions. Notably, President Trump's administration has imposed 25% tariffs on Canadian imports, citing various economic and security concerns. In retaliation, Canada announced a 25% tariff on CA$155 billion worth of U.S. goods, with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau emphasizing the necessity to protect Canadian interests. 

These escalating trade disputes have strained diplomatic relations, leading to discussions within the U.S. administration about potentially expelling Canada from the Five Eyes intelligence alliance. Peter Navarro, a senior White House official, has suggested this move to pressure Ottawa over trade disagreements. Such an expulsion could significantly reduce intelligence-sharing between Canadian and U.S. agencies, thereby increasing Canada's vulnerability to cyber threats.

The deterioration in relations may also expose Canada to heightened cyber espionage activities. Adversaries could exploit weakened international partnerships to infiltrate Canadian networks, targeting sensitive governmental and industrial information. This risk is compounded by potential disruptions to technology supply chains, as tariffs and trade barriers could hinder Canada's access to essential cybersecurity tools and services sourced from the U.S. 

In light of these challenges, Canada has proactively launched a new National Cyber Security Strategy aimed at bolstering its defenses against evolving cyber threats. This strategy emphasizes the importance of building a robust cybersecurity industry within Canada to reduce reliance on foreign technologies and enhance national security. 

By investing in domestic cybersecurity firms, strengthening alliances with European and Indo-Pacific nations, and increasing funding for AI-driven cybersecurity research, Canada aims to mitigate the risks posed by geopolitical tensions and ensure the resilience of its critical infrastructure.

Recent trade disputes between the U.S. and Canada, along with broader global trade tensions, could have a direct impact on Canada’s cybersecurity landscape. Key risks include:

• Reduced intelligence-sharing between Canadian and U.S. agencies if diplomatic relations deteriorate.
• Increased risk of cyber espionage from adversaries seeking to exploit weakened international partnerships.
• Disruptions to technology supply chains, affecting Canada’s ability to source cybersecurity tools and services.

As the U.S. prioritizes domestic cybersecurity initiatives, Canada must proactively strengthen its sovereign cybersecurity capabilities by:

1. Investing in Canadian cybersecurity firms to develop homegrown solutions.
2. Building stronger alliances with European and Indo-Pacific nations for cybersecurity cooperation.
3. Increasing government funding for AI-driven cybersecurity research to counter emerging threats.

Conclusion: Supporting Canadian Cybersecurity for a Resilient Future

International alliances remain a cornerstone of Canada’s cybersecurity defense strategy, but reliance on external partnerships alone is not enough—especially as geopolitical tensions mount. Canada must take a dual approach by:

• Strengthening its existing partnerships with the U.S., NATO, and private-sector firms.
• Investing in its own cybersecurity industry to reduce dependence on foreign technologies.

Supporting Canada’s tech sector not only enhances national security but also creates economic opportunities in the high-growth cybersecurity industry. By fostering innovation, strengthening cybersecurity legislation, and promoting public-private collaboration, Canada can remain a global leader in defending critical infrastructure against an increasingly hostile digital landscape.

‍